Divvy is a new on-chain Web3 Sportsbook looking to flip the narrative of the House ‘always winning’ by allowing participants themselves to be the House.
Online gambling has been growing at an extremely fast pace throughout the world, but this growth has exposed some fundamental issues with the platforms available which Divvy aims to solve. Traditional Web2 betting platforms lack the transparency for users to know if the operator genuinely has the liquidity to cover winning bets, with several operations having been exposed as relying on a ponzi-esque models where new customer deposits are being used to support payouts.
Divvy.bet aims to fix these problems with their fully on-chain Casino and providing solutions such as:
The Divvy House Passes are the Gen0 collection for the Divvy ecosystem and are distributed across 4 Tiers as follows:
Differences in function will be covered under ‘Utility’.
$DVY represents the native token for Divvy.Bet and can be earned for engaging with the platform. They will also be allocated to Divvy Pass holders with additional details to be released at DVY token launch
The Litepaper refers to a future ‘Divvians’ NFT drop. Upon questioning the team, Sam was able to confirm that Divvians are a future PFP collection.
A dedicated channel in the Divvy Discord outlines Housepass Utilities but I will endeavour to summarise it as best as I can. As mentioned previously, the House Passes operate on a tier basis with rewards as follows:
Once again, clarification was required due to contradictory wording from the team. The Housepass Utilities channel stipulates the following:
I asked where this 20% was coming from and the answer was as follows:
You may recall this screenshot from the About page. So technically it isn’t a straight 20% revshare. It’s actually 1% of profitable events go to NFT and $DVY stakers but through some mathematical gymnastics, it could be perceived as an average of 20%.
As previously mentioned $DVY will be earned as a reward for use of the platform and allocated to Divvy Pass holders. $DVY will be primarily used as follows:
Carlos Liang
Moe Rahim
Keisuke Watanabe
Samuel James
Anton Licul
I’m going to be perfectly blunt. This project is riddled with red flags which I will endeavour to get through as didactically as possible.
Online gambling is a highly regulated space. We’ve seen the difficulties and hoops other projects need to jump through to get their licensing. Through my conversation with them in a Discord ticket, Loso was able to clarify that the platform is currently licenced out of Costa Rica and was compared to the Curacao licence many platforms are using.
My chief concern from a legal standpoint is the lack of KYC. If they were to catch the attention of any regulator, I am confident that they will come down hard on a platform like Divvy.
Furthermore, the notion of earning $DVY tokens for bets placed is essentially incentivising bets which also raises potential legal issues.
I will admit, I am a stickler for how things are worded as I like to be very clear in my understanding of how things work, but even then I would make the case that some of the wording provided has not only been awful, but contradictory.
As demonstrated in previous screenshots provided, wording provided in their Litepaper or Housepass Utilities were either incorrect or technically true if you did some mathematical gymnastics which in my opinion, is extremely poor form. What was most shocking to me was that when I pointed this fact out, I was told that it would need editing and that it was something they missed since someone else wrote it.
I can understand out-sourcing writing of the Whitepaper as it often helps to have someone else explain your concepts in simpler terms, but the fact that such an important point was missed in the process of proof-reading is not a good sign. At time of writing, it has been a week since this point was brought up and no changes have been made as yet.
Something else I’m not clear on is the pass rewards mechanism. I can only infer that Divvy House Pass rewards do not stack. If they did, then staking 5 Silver House Passes should yield a 50% boost to $DVY yield and referral earnings but that wouldn’t make sense given it states you need to stake 10 of them to unlock Gold tier rewards which is 20% boost.
But then that begs the question, what reason is there to have between 2 and 9 Silver House Passes given the rewards don’t stack? It leaves a lot of middle ground between 1 and 10 where the rewards aren’t altered by the number of passes you have staked.
The point was also made that ‘profitable events’ would result in the distribution of profits with 98% going to House Pool, 1% to the Foundation and 1% to NFT/$DVY stakers. Now is this every individual bet where this is triggered? Or do they aggregate the winning and losing bets over a period of time and then distribute net profits if there are any? To do so on an individual bet basis seems like madness because it then begs the question, what about losses?
Whilst this tagline can seem appealing to people who have long suffered from losing to the ‘house edge’, the cynic in me sees being ‘the House’ as assuming all the risk from a financial standpoint. Consider a worst case scenario that somebody wins big from a single bet. Or a series of bets simultaneously drain a large amount of the House Pool of liquidity because after all, it is your job as the LP to cover the winning bets. I understand that the end goal is that over the long run, the House Pool will come out at a net positive, but there will almost certainly be periods of time as a new staker where your share of the House Pool drops below your initial contribution. What happens if enough people panic and pull their funds out? Suddenly the House Pool is smaller meaning it can’t support the same volume of bets meaning it will take longer for you to make your money back. Of course this is a worst case scenario but not a game I’m willing to play.
Personally, I won’t be participating on any level, whether that be as an NFT holder or liquidity provider. There are simply too many areas of concern that mean I will not be engaging with this project.